Hot Topics: Now Open: 2013 On the Rise Nominations | Attorney: Brooks didn't steal money | Photos: Atlanta Bar Association
Friday, May 24, 2013
In a case that reads like it came straight out of a Hollywood crime drama, a woman said she and her vehicle were commandeered by law enforcement officers and forced to chase a prisoner escaping on foot who, when finally apprehended, was tossed in her back seat while she cowered behind the wheel. Kevin Leipow (above) says his client required treatment for anxiety and fear after the incident.
A hospital and its lawyers are striking back at the judge who tossed its defense and its counsel out of a medical malpractice trial for allegedly intimidating an expert witness.
The Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's confirmation of the interim arbitration award and judgment entered in favor of S & S Financial Mortgage Corporation arising out of breach of contract and fraud claims against First Option Mortgage LLC concerning the transfer of S & S's president's interest in a financial company to First Option, holding that interim arbitration awards may be confirmed.
Earlier this month the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed - and quickly settled - its first lawsuit accusing an employer of gathering illegal genetic information during a job applicant's medical exam.
One law school is giving applicants who don't make the initial admissions cut a second chance to prove they have what it takes. And it's doing it for free.
A good defendant can be hard to find. This is especially true in the Internet age where wrongdoers hide behind international boundaries, proxy servers in remote locations, and vague online identities.
Friday, May 24, 2013
Supreme Court of Georgia, Criminal Case
The defendant failed to prove that the 8-year delay before trial violated his right to a speedy trial after he was charged with murder.
CRIMINAL PRACTICE:Speedy Trial, Effective Assistance of Counsel
Supreme Court of Georgia, Civil Case
The trial court erred in granting a medical malpractice plaintiff's motion to compel the production of transcripts of ex parte physician interviews defense counsel conducted pursuant to a qualified protective order.
Supreme Court of Georgia, Civil Case
The essential terms of a postnuptial agreement, which the wife had prepared, were not present and agreed upon by the parties.
TORTS:Medical Malpractice; CIVIL PRACTICE:Discovery, Protective Order
Supreme Court of Georgia, Civil Case
The trial court's judgment in a divorce action failed to contain sufficient findings of fact to clarify its exercise of discretion in arriving at the equitable division of marital property, and the husband made a timely request for findings of fact and conclusions of law.
FAMILY LAW:Postnuptial Agreement, Divorce, Alimony, Child Support; CONTRACTS:Ambiguity
Supreme Court of Georgia, Civil Case
Loan documents authorized the bank to accelerate and file suit to collect all amounts owed when the borrower failed to cure the payment default after receiving timely notice of the default.
FAMILY LAW:Divorce, Marital Property, Child Custody; CIVIL PRACTICE:Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Supreme Court of Georgia, Civil Case
In considering three certified questions regarding the operation of Georgia's law governing non-judicial foreclosure, the Supreme Court held that the holder of a deed to secure debt does not have to also hold the note or have any beneficial interest in the debt obligation underlying the deed in order to exercise the power of sale.
CREDITORS AND DEBTORS RIGHTS:Suit on Note, Deficiency, Liens; ATTORNEYS FEES:Expenses of Litigation; DAMAGES:Punitive Damages; CONSTITUTIONAL LAW:Due Process
Friday, May 24, 2013
A good defendant can be hard to find. This is especially true in the Internet age where wrongdoers hide behind international boundaries, proxy servers in remote locations, and vague online identities.
Among its many changes, the America Invents Act (AIA) provides several new post-grant procedures for a third party to challenge the validity of an issued U.S. patent.
As the economy starts to improve, attorneys will increasingly explore the possibilities of moving to new law firms.
In-house counsel tackled an increased number of class-action lawsuits last year, but managed to tamp down legal spending by an average of $100,000 per matter, according to the 2013 Carlton Fields Class Action Survey.
Shareholder activists are flexing their muscles with a new exuberance this proxy season, running more insurgent slates in proxy contests, stalking larger targets and enjoying a higher rate of success.
Much of the discussion in the media on whether the surviving Boston bombing suspect should have been given Miranda warnings when he was arrested appears to be based on a misconception: that law enforcement officers are required to give suspects the warnings set forth in Miranda v. Arizona and that failure to do so is a violation of the law, at least if the public-safety exception doesn't apply. That is not correct.
Oral arguments at the Georgia Supreme Court by James Cobb for the Appellants. Trip Network (Doing Business as "Cheaptickets") et al. v. Dempsey, Judge, et al.
These six firms presented the best evidence that they won results for clients in 2012, whether it was in favorable verdicts, dismissals, settlements or other actions that protected clients' interests. Read More...