Daily Report Online
  • News
  • Special Reports
  • Court Opinions
  • Court Calendars
  • Bench Guide
  • Public Notices
  • Contact
  • Books
  • Events
  • Classifieds

Home > Judiciary ready on e-filing, lacks only funding

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Letter to the Editor

Judiciary ready on e-filing, lacks only funding

By Marla S. Moore All Articles 

Daily Report

March 22, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

A March 18 Daily Report article ("House budget bill doesn't fund electronic filing for courts") suggested Georgia's judiciary is not prepared to initiate a statewide civil e-filing project, and this was the reason the state's 2014 fiscal year budget did not include an appropriation for e-filing project oversight.

However, thanks to the Statewide Judiciary Civil E-filing Steering Committee, the Administrative Office of the Courts has been preparing to move forward on an e-filing initiative for all Georgia courts for several months. Accordingly, the Judicial Council requested $208,000 in the 2014 budget to initiate a statewide civil e-filing project.

The committee is working diligently to bring e-filing to every level of court. Committee members include judges, court clerks, attorneys, legislators and the executive branch. This committee has seen first-hand that Georgia is lagging in a service that can benefit all of its citizens by lowering the costs of taking matters to court and improving the efficiency of the court system through automation.

In 2011, the State Bar passed a resolution supporting e-filing, saying "… the public interest would be best served by all stakeholders working together to develop a uniform statewide electronic court filing and retrieval system." The resolution went on to request that the courts "immediately begin coordinating efforts to design, build and administer" an e-filing system.

Georgia's courts serve our citizens on less than 1 percent of the state's budget. But the judiciary simply does not have the staffing resources to further this high-impact project. The start-up funding request to the General Assembly will allow the courts to hire an experienced program director to guide the civil e-filing project and build collaboration with the many stakeholders in the court system. This is a necessary starting point.

As Georgia attorneys are well aware, many other states already offer electronic filing to their citizens, as do the federal courts. Georgia's delays are not a technology problem. The stakeholders understand the issues, the complexity of this project, and that such a large-scale project needs to be managed. A task of this magnitude will need the support of all three branches of government to succeed.

As the House and the Senate confer on the 2014 fiscal year budget, this request sits in limbo. Should the legislature appropriate the necessary resources to pursue this project properly, the public should know that the courts stand ready to move this effort forward.

Marla S. Moore, Director, Administrative Office of the Courts



Subscribe to Daily Report

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • State Bar
  • Judicial Council
  • Administrative Office of the Courts
  • Statewide Judiciary Civil E-filing Steering Committee
  • General Assembly

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Lawyers Sanctioned Over Porn Lawsuits File Appeal
    •      
  2. Court: Injured College Student Can't Sue State
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  3. DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses
    •      
  4. Lawyer Discipline: Cases Include Suspension, License Surrender
    •      
  5. Lenders Win On Foreclosures
    •         
      • Subscription Required
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

In Tricky Prosecutions, Judges Play Peacemakers

Ropers Majeski Tries to Re-Invent Itself
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Not Covered for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Firm Takes Another Hit in Bid for 'Unconscionable' Fees

New York's Martin Act Faces Test in Challenge to 2005 Case

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Follow That Escapee!'

Judge Who Tossed Defense Counsel Accused of 'Partiality'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • Contact Daily Report   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media