Daily Report Online
  • News
  • Special Reports
  • Court Opinions
  • Court Calendars
  • Bench Guide
  • Public Notices
  • Contact
  • Books
  • Events
  • Classifieds

Home > Chairman: Ga. Senate will back $100 lobbying cap

Font Size: increase font decrease font

News

Chairman: Ga. Senate will back $100 lobbying cap

By Ray Henry All Articles 

The Associated Press

March 20, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

ATLANTA (AP) - The Senate will propose a $100 cap on lobbyist expenditures, not an outright ban, creating a conflict with House lawmakers in the waning days of the General Assembly's annual session, a leading Senate Republican said Wednesday.

The Senate Rules Committee will meet Thursday to put forward its version of lobbying restrictions originally written by House Speaker David Ralston, said Sen. Jeff Mullis, R-Chickamauga, the committee chairman. Mullis said he hopes the full Senate will vote on the proposal Friday. The committee had originally planned to meet Wednesday.

If lawmakers want to send a bill to Gov. Nathan Deal, they will have to act quickly. Any legislation not approved before the General Assembly ends its annual 40-day session on March 28 automatically fails for the year.

"On midnight on Thursday it's over regardless of whether we're finished with it or not," said Mullis, who acknowledged the looming deadline in an interview. He said approving a bill by Friday would give House lawmakers time to study it next week before they decide whether to approve changes made by the Senate.

House and Senate leaders are divided on the specifics of Ralston's proposal.

Ralston's plan would generally prohibit lobbyists from spending money on individual lawmakers, though it leaves big exceptions. For example, lobbyists could still legally wine and dine legislative committees, caucuses and delegations. Lobbyists could also pay for lawmaker travel to events related to their official duties, though not airfare.

Several senators have criticized Ralston's plan because it could require that some people seeking to influence lawmakers on behalf of nonprofit or small groups register as lobbyists and comply with financial disclosure requirements. The state Senate earlier this year imposed an internal rule banning its members from accepting gifts worth more than $100 from lobbyists, not an outright prohibition.

Mullis said enacting a total ban could prevent people from spending even nominal sums when meeting with lawmakers.

"I think it's important we have a mechanism like a $100 cap so we can build those relationships," Mullis said.

Mullis said Georgia voters supported a cap in a nonbinding ballot question this summer. About 87 percent of voters in the Republican primary election — roughly 827,800 people — voted in support of a $100 limit on lobbyist gifts. Nearly 73 percent of voters in the Democratic primary — about 423,800 people — voted in support of stopping unlimited lobbyist spending on lawmakers, though that ballot question did not propose a specific limit.

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2

Next

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Senate Rules Committee
  • General Assembly

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Lawyer Vanishes Leaving N.J. Firm With A Broken Settlement
    •      
  2. Student Sues Over Facebook Photo Use
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  3. U.S. High Court Vacates 11th Cir. On Plea
    •      
  4. EBG Ditching Atlanta Office
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  5. 'Gideon's Army' Rallies Its Troops For Justice
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

In-House Counsel Go to Privacy Boot Camp

In-House Changes at News Corp Ahead of Corporate Split

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

Nine Tips to Avoid Starring in a Spreadsheet Horror Story

Snapshot: Tom Gelbmann

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of HUD Forms Draws Supreme Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Restaurant in Union Square Park Ruled Permissible
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Magistrate Judge Finds Few Benefits to Class in Settlement
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Third Circuit Could See Rise in Pay-for-Delay Litigation

Cozen Debt Forgiveness Is Campaign Contribution, Court Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Interim Dean Named at Texas Wesleyan University School of Law
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Water Works: H2O Kept Lawyer-Lobbyists Busy
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Boosting Lawyers And Saving Lives
  •      
    • Subscription Required

11th Circuit Conflicted On Juveniles Stance
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment

  • Contact Daily Report   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media