Daily Report Online
  • News
  • Special Reports
  • Court Opinions
  • Court Calendars
  • Bench Guide
  • Public Notices
  • Contact
  • Books
  • Events
  • Classifieds

Home > FTC to set hearing to undo merger of Albany hospitals

Font Size: increase font decrease font

News

FTC to set hearing to undo merger of Albany hospitals

Legal Times

March 19, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

With a U.S. Supreme Court victory in hand, the Federal Trade Commission is moving forward with its administrative case to undo the merger of the only two hospitals in Albany.

On Feb. 19, the high court in FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health System Inc. ruled unanimously that the state action doctrine did not immunize the hospital acquisition from the federal antitrust laws.

The FTC has lifted the stay on its so-called Part 3 administrative proceeding, with a trial date set for July 15 at the latest.

"Time is of the essence because 'this is now a consummated acquisition in which significant integration of hospital assets and operations—and likely, interim harm to competition—may have taken place,'" the FTC commissioners wrote in the March 14 order lifting the stay.

The FTC in April 2011 brought two complaints challenging the merger, one in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia and another administratively. The administrative proceeding was stayed pending resolution of the federal court litigation. The FTC in district court lost its bid for a preliminary injunction to stop the deal, and lost before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit. The Supreme Court remanded the case.

Now, the FTC is pursuing its administrative hearing. The commissioners overruled objections from the hospital to lift the stay, writing "[respondents] have not indicated that they intend to file such a motion—nor indeed provided any grounds for the Court's reconsideration."

The hospitals were represented by Wilmer Culter Pickering Hale and Dorr partner Seth Waxman before the Supreme Court and Baker & McKenzie; Weil, Gotshal & Manges; Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett; Flynn Peeler & Phillips; Bondurant, Mixson & Elmore; Baudino Law Group; Perry & Walters; and Parker, Hudson, Rainer & Dobbs before the 11th Circuit.



Subscribe to Legal Times

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
  • Weil, Gotshal & Manges
  • Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • 11th Circuit
  • Perry & Walters
  • Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett
  • Phoebe Putney Health System
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • Supreme Court
  • U.S. Court of Appeals

Key categories

    
  • Antitrust and Trade Regulation

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Real Estate Lawyers Target Closing Vendors
    •      
  2. DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses
    •      
  3. Wage-and-Hour Suits Up For Fifth Straight Year
    •      
  4. Lawyer Discipline: Cases Include Suspension, License Surrender
    •      
  5. Lenders Win On Foreclosures
    •         
      • Subscription Required
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

The General Counsel and the Compensation Committee

Your Company's Been Hacked -- What Comes Next?

Simpson Helps Yahoo, Tumblr Connect for $1 Billion Deal

Kasowitz Benson Launches in Los Angeles

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Collaboration Is Key to Defending Cyberattacks

Stanford Law Builds on Role as Legal Tech Incubator

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Circuit Voids $3 Million Judgment Against Girls Gone Wild Producer

Judge Says Boston Bombings Had No Effect on Terrorist Sentences
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Court System, Counties Agree on 3 Court Facility Upgrades

Guardian Who Delayed Final Account Must Pay Referee Fee
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Lawsuit Testing Federal Porn Regulation to Proceed

Ex-Quarterback Can Press Claim Over EA's Video Game
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Transocean, Halliburton, Anadarko Entities
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Insurer Beats Bid By Bilked Client
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Barnes Asks For Court-Appointed Lawyer To Help Defend Brooks

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media