Daily Report Online
  • News
  • Special Reports
  • Court Opinions
  • Court Calendars
  • Bench Guide
  • Public Notices
  • Contact
  • Books
  • Events
  • Classifieds

Home > Second settlement in BAR/BRI antitrust case made for $9.5M

Font Size: increase font decrease font

News

Second settlement in BAR/BRI antitrust case made for $9.5M

The National Law Journal

March 18, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

The second time was the charm for a settlement in a class action alleging that law school students paid too much for BAR/BRI bar review preparatory course materials after West Publishing Corp. and Kaplan Inc. conspired to monopolize the market.

A fresh agreement provides for a payment of $9.5 million in cash. Lawyers told U.S. District Judge Manuel Real in Los Angeles, who rejected a previous settlement in 2011, that they would file documents by today seeking preliminary approval of the new deal. Real scheduled a hearing for April 15.

The case, filed on Feb. 6, 2008, is distinct from a $49 million class settlement against West and Kaplan Inc. that Real approved in 2007. That case, filed in 2005, involved a class of 300,000 students who claimed they were overcharged for the Law School Admission Test preparatory course after West and Kaplan conspired to monopolize the market in violation of the Sherman Act. Under that settlement, which involved purchases from 1997 and 2006, each student was to receive $125.

The newer case, filed on behalf of two law school graduates who alleged they overpaid for their courses and three law students who expected to take the bar exam in 2008 and 2009, involves those who purchased the courses as of Aug. 1, 2006.

Real preliminarily approved a deal on March 21, 2011, but rejected it after objectors raised concerns that Kaplan's portion of the deal involved coupons. Under the initial deal, West would have paid $5.29 million and Kaplan would have provided certificates worth $150 toward the purchase of course materials.

Real sent the case back to the Ninth Circuit. On Nov. 7, 2011, that court reversed his dismissal order and referred the case to mediation. On Jan. 14, lawyers in the case told the Ninth Circuit they had reached a new settlement, which they outlined in court documents on March 7.



Subscribe to The National Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • West and Kaplan
  • West Publishing Inc.
  • Ninth Circuit

Key categories

    
  • Law Schools

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Lawyer Vanishes Leaving N.J. Firm With A Broken Settlement
    •      
  2. Student Sues Over Facebook Photo Use
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  3. U.S. High Court Vacates 11th Cir. On Plea
    •      
  4. 'Gideon's Army' Rallies Its Troops For Justice
    •      
  5. EBG Ditching Atlanta Office
    •         
      • Subscription Required
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

In-House Counsel Go to Privacy Boot Camp

In-House Changes at News Corp Ahead of Corporate Split

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

Nine Tips to Avoid Starring in a Spreadsheet Horror Story

Snapshot: Tom Gelbmann

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of Forms Draws N.J. High Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Ties to Senecas Cannot Shield Golf Course Developer, Panel Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Circuit Decision Costs Prevailing Attorneys $200,000 Fee Award
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corbett Signs Bill to Eliminate Traffic Court

Christian College Granted Injunction In Obamacare Suit
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Interim Dean Named at Texas Wesleyan University School of Law
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Water Works: H2O Kept Lawyer-Lobbyists Busy
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Boosting Lawyers And Saving Lives
  •      
    • Subscription Required

11th Circuit Conflicted On Juveniles Stance
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment

  • Contact Daily Report   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media