Daily Report Online
  • News
  • Special Reports
  • Court Opinions
  • Court Calendars
  • Bench Guide
  • Public Notices
  • Contact
  • Books
  • Events
  • Classifieds

Home > Bill to allow guns in court draws opposition

Font Size: increase font decrease font

News

Bill to allow guns in court draws opposition

By Kathleen Baydala Joyner Contact All Articles 

Daily Report

March 14, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

Georgia's Council of Superior Court Judges opposes a portion of a bill that would allow licensed gun owners to bring firearms into unguarded courthouses and judicial buildings.

Douglas County Superior Court Judge David Emerson, who is president of the council, said Wednesday the group's legislative committee is against that section of House Bill 512.

The bill passed the House of Representatives last week and is before the Senate. Last week Emerson said his group was surprised by the provision, adding, "In my courtroom, I do not allow firearms on anybody other than courtroom security officers—even [police] officers, who we trust, aren't allowed. I don't like the idea of a witness on a witness stand with a gun."

House Bill 512 would ease restrictions on where gun owners with concealed carry permits may bring their firearms. The provision opposed by the superior court judges' council states that gun owners may carry their guns into government buildings and courthouses "where ingress to such building or courthouse is not restricted or screened by security personnel."

The bill is now before the Senate Judiciary Non-Civil Committee, which is chaired by Sen. Jesse Stone, R-Waynesboro, who is a lawyer. Neither Stone nor the bill's initial sponsor, Rep. Rick Jasperse, R-Jasper, could be reached immediately Wednesday to discuss the judges' opposition.

On Wednesday, DeKalb County Sheriff Thomas Brown issued a statement saying he opposes the carry provisions.

"In DeKalb, we have had several occasions in which victims, criminal suspects and even those in opposing civil legal positions have argued and even fought," Brown said. "The only guns needed for protection of these individuals were the ones carried by my deputies. If those involved in courthouse conflicts possessed weapons, the outcomes would definitely have been different."

 



Subscribe to Daily Report

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Senate Judiciary Non-Civil Committee
  • Council of Superior Court Judges
  • Superior Court
  • House of Representatives

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Lawyers Sanctioned Over Porn Lawsuits File Appeal
    •      
  2. Court: Injured College Student Can't Sue State
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  3. It's Time For U.S. Courts To Consider Service Of Process By Social Media
    •      
  4. DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses
    •      
  5. Lawyer Discipline: Cases Include Suspension, License Surrender
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

In Tricky Prosecutions, Judges Play Peacemakers

Ropers Majeski Tries to Re-Invent Itself
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Not Covered for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Firm Takes Another Hit in Bid for 'Unconscionable' Fees

New York's Martin Act Faces Test in Challenge to 2005 Case

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Follow That Escapee!'

Judge Who Tossed Defense Counsel Accused of 'Partiality'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • Contact Daily Report   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media