Daily Report Online
  • News
  • Special Reports
  • Court Opinions
  • Court Calendars
  • Bench Guide
  • Public Notices
  • Contact
  • Books
  • Events
  • Classifieds

Home > Congress considers cameras in federal courts, again

Font Size: increase font decrease font

News

Congress considers cameras in federal courts, again

By Todd Ruger Contact All Articles 

Legal Times

March 6, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

Congress is once again considering a bill that would give federal judges at all levels the option to open their courtrooms to television cameras and radio broadcasts.

Senator Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Representative Steve King, R-Iowa, have filed the "Sunshine in the Courtroom Act," and Democrats have co-sponsored the bills in both chambers, Grassley's office announced.

Grassley has introduced a version of the bill with Senator Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., since 1999, and Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Senator Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., is a co-sponsor.

"Openness in our courts improves the public's understanding of what happens inside our courts. Our judicial system remains a mystery to too many people across the country," Grassley said on the Senate floor Thursday. "That doesn't need to continue."

The bill's provisions fall short of other bills routinely introduced (but never passed) that would force cameras in the courtroom, even including that of the U.S. Supreme Court. If passed, Grassley's bill would expire after three years so Congress could study the effects of the legislation before making any permanent changes.

Grassley said Iowa has allowed cameras in its courtrooms with great results. Studies and surveys show that electronic media coverage of trials "boosts public understanding of the court system without interfering with court proceedings," Grassley said in his statement.

"Courts are the bedrock of the American justice system," Grassley said on the Senate floor. "I believe that granting the public greater access to an already public proceeding will inspire greater faith in and appreciation for our judges who pledge equal and impartial justice for all."

Only the District of Columbia prohibits trial and appellate court coverage entirely, Grassley said.

Grassley's bill gives non-party witnesses the right to have their faces and voices obscured, and it prohibits the televising of jurors. The bill also includes a provision to protect the due process rights of each party, Grassley said.

King is joined in the House by representatives Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, Ted Deutch, D-Fla., and Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif. A version passed the Senate Judiciary Committee in 2009, but was never brought up on the Senate floor.

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2

Next



Subscribe to Legal Times

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Democrats
  • Senate Judiciary Committee
  • Supreme Court of the United States

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Real Estate Lawyers Target Closing Vendors
    •      
  2. Wage-and-Hour Suits Up For Fifth Straight Year
    •      
  3. DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses
    •      
  4. Lawyer and Client to Pay Attorney Fees of Waffle House CEO
    •      
  5. DeKalb DA Tries To Serve Judge During Jury Selection
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Taking the Reins of Legal Department Operations

In-House Law: Now in 3-D!

Simpson Helps Yahoo, Tumblr Connect for $1 Billion Deal

Kasowitz Benson Launches in Los Angeles

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Collaboration Is Key to Defending Cyberattacks

Stanford Law Builds on Role as Legal Tech Incubator

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Appellate Division To Roll Out Electronic Case Filing System

Court Limits Liability for Injury Or Death of One Invited To Help
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Judge Declines to Block Act-of-War Defense in 9/11 Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Panel Finds 'Excessive' City Fine for Poaching Antenna From Trash
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Lawsuit Testing Federal Porn Regulation Allowed to Survive

Ex-College QB Can Press Claim Over EA's Video Game
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Water Warriors: Local Governments Bring Pollution Suits
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Brooks Looks To Political Ally For Criminal Defense

Attorney Fee Hearing in Waffle House Sex Case Heats Up
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media