Daily Report Online
  • News
  • Special Reports
  • Court Opinions
  • Court Calendars
  • Bench Guide
  • Public Notices
  • Contact
  • Books
  • Events
  • Classifieds

Home > Md. high court overturns jury award in Exxon case

Font Size: increase font decrease font

News

Md. high court overturns jury award in Exxon case

By Jessica Gresko All Articles 

The Associated Press

February 27, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

Maryland's highest court has overturned jury verdicts that ordered Exxon Mobil Corp. to pay more than $1.5 billion in damages from a 2006 leak at a gasoline station that polluted a community's drinking water.



In two rulings issued Tuesday, the Court of Appeals of Maryland also ordered new trials in the cases related to the spill. In the larger of the two cases involving approximately 150 families and businesses, a jury in 2011 awarded $1 billion in punitive damages and $495 million in compensatory damages after a trial that lasted months. Seven judges sitting on the court overruled the punitive damages, saying they could only be awarded if the plaintiffs proved Exxon had intended to act wrongfully.



The judges said that the Irving, Texas-based company could have done a better job communicating with residents during cleanup from the spill. But the court said plaintiffs didn't show clear and convincing evidence that Exxon intended to mislead anyone or that they were harmed by relying on any statements the company made.



In addition, the court overturned awards the jury handed out for emotional distress and awards related to property values. The court said some residents were awarded money for emotional distress but didn't provide evidence their wells were contaminated. A few had contaminated wells but didn't show any injury linked to contaminated water. Some residents were improperly awarded money based on the fear that their property values would decline. Others got awards even though wells on their property were not found to be contaminated.



The court also overturned jury awards in a case that involved about 90 households. The jury had awarded approximately $150 million in damages in that case.



Exxon said in a statement it was reviewing the court's decision but that the company had "acted appropriately after the accident and the court has agreed."



"We have apologized to the Jacksonville community and we remain ready to compensate those who were truly damaged by this unfortunate accident. We will continue the cleanup," the statement said.



Attorneys for both groups of plaintiffs did not immediately return telephone messages left Wednesday.



Both cases stem from a leak at an Exxon station in the community of Jacksonville, a small, affluent community about 20 miles north of Baltimore. An Exxon contractor doing work at the station punctured a gasoline feed line and the leak was not properly repaired. That allowed more 26,000 gallons of fuel to pour into the ground over more than a month. Many residents in the area get their water from wells, and the spill led the state to order well monitoring in the area.



___



Follow Jessica Gresko at http://twitter.com/jessicagresko

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Exxon Mobil Corporation
  • Court of Appeals

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Lawyers Sanctioned Over Porn Lawsuits File Appeal
    •      
  2. Court: Injured College Student Can't Sue State
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  3. DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses
    •      
  4. Lawyer Discipline: Cases Include Suspension, License Surrender
    •      
  5. Lenders Win On Foreclosures
    •         
      • Subscription Required
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

In Tricky Prosecutions, Judges Play Peacemakers

Ropers Majeski Tries to Re-Invent Itself
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Not Covered for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Firm Takes Another Hit in Bid for 'Unconscionable' Fees

New York's Martin Act Faces Test in Challenge to 2005 Case

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Follow That Escapee!'

Judge Who Tossed Defense Counsel Accused of 'Partiality'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • Contact Daily Report   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media