Daily Report Online
  • News
  • Special Reports
  • Court Opinions
  • Court Calendars
  • Bench Guide
  • Public Notices
  • Contact
  • Books
  • Events
  • Classifieds

Home > Proposed bill on Holt demands is balanced, innovative

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Letter to the Editor

Proposed bill on Holt demands is balanced, innovative

By Robin Frazer Clark, President State Bar of Georgia All Articles 

Daily Report

February 28, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 
Robin Clark says the leadership of the State Bar of Georgia should reflect the diversity of its members.

Robin Clark says the leadership of the State Bar of Georgia should reflect the diversity of its members.
File Photo

As president of the State Bar of Georgia, I must respond to the letter writer of "Legislation to curb Holt demands is flawed," published Feb. 25.

First and foremost, it is wrong to accuse any Georgia court of paying "lip service" to the rule of law. That statement attempts to undermine the integrity and credibility of our courts. Georgia's judges are doing their best to fairly and neutrally apply the law to the facts. Also, the judicial branch has multiple levels of review (appeals) to self-correct any mistakes.

During my years of experience litigating many cases involving insurance companies, numerous Georgia judges have ruled for and against my clients. While I may have been disappointed, never once has it ever occurred to me that any judge has been biased, or has in any way not done her or his very best to seek justice for all of the parties.

Georgia House Speaker David Ralston, R-Blue Ridge, along with Rep. Jay Powell, R-Camilla, and his bipartisan team of co-sponsors who introduced HB 336, and Rep. Wendell Willard, R-Sandy Springs, chairman, and other members of the House Judiciary Committee which favorably reported the legislation are to be commended for their efforts to address this issue through such balanced and innovative approach.

If enacted, this will be the first third-party law of its kind in the United States and would help protect the rights of policy holders, including small businesses and responsibly insured people, from ridiculous bad faith results. In fact, it is difficult to understand why the letter writer would be against it.

Our leaders, through this proposed legislation, have demonstrated they are interested in finding a viable solution for what is truly in the best interests of upholding the rule of law and protecting the rights of all of Georgia's citizens.

Robin Frazer Clark, President State Bar of Georgia



Subscribe to Daily Report

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • State Bar
  • House Judiciary Committee
  • State of Georgia House

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Lawyers Sanctioned Over Porn Lawsuits File Appeal
    •      
  2. Court: Injured College Student Can't Sue State
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  3. DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses
    •      
  4. Lawyer Discipline: Cases Include Suspension, License Surrender
    •      
  5. Lenders Win On Foreclosures
    •         
      • Subscription Required
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

In Tricky Prosecutions, Judges Play Peacemakers

Ropers Majeski Tries to Re-Invent Itself
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Not Covered for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Firm Takes Another Hit in Bid for 'Unconscionable' Fees

New York's Martin Act Faces Test in Challenge to 2005 Case

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Follow That Escapee!'

Judge Who Tossed Defense Counsel Accused of 'Partiality'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • Contact Daily Report   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media