Daily Report Online
  • News
  • Special Reports
  • Court Opinions
  • Court Calendars
  • Bench Guide
  • Public Notices
  • Contact
  • Books
  • Events
  • Classifieds

Home > Where are the attorney-client limits?

Font Size: increase font decrease font

IN PRACTICE

Where are the attorney-client limits?

Avoid disqualification by managing client relationships, knowing the ethics rules

By Simon R. Malko All Articles 

Daily Report

February 19, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 
Photo of Simon Malko

Simon R. Malko

Many attorneys incorrectly assume that an attorney-client relationship automatically ends when the work for the client is complete. That is not always the case.

Some courts have held that the attorney-client relationship continues, even after the billable work is complete, if the client has a reasonable belief that the engagement is open-ended. This issue often arises when an attorney tries to take on a new engagement adverse to a client for whom the attorney previously performed some work.

The ethics rules impose tight restrictions on when an attorney can be adverse to an existing client but provide much more liberal standards for engagements adverse to a former client. Thus, if an attorney does not confirm that an engagement has concluded, the attorney may be disqualified from taking on a future engagement adverse to a client.

Conflicts rules

Georgia Rule of Professional Conduct 1.7 generally prohibits an attorney from being adverse to an existing client unless certain conditions are met and the client consents. Moreover, with limited exceptions, it is not ethically permissible for an attorney to be adverse to an existing client in litigation, even if the litigation is wholly unrelated to the attorney's engagement for that client. 1

By contrast, Rule 1.9 requires only consent from the former client if the attorney intends to be adverse to a former client "in the same or a substantially related matter" to the lawyer's prior engagement.

No client consent is necessary if the attorney's new engagement adverse to a former client is unrelated to the prior work. Furthermore, there is no general prohibition against suing a former client.

Thus, whether it is ethically permissible for an attorney to accept a new engagement adverse to a client will often turn on the determination of whether that client is a former client or current client.2

When does a client

become a "former client"?

The comments to Georgia Rule of Professional Conduct 1.3 provide, in relevant part, the following general guidance regarding the termination of an attorney-client relationship:

"If an attorney's employment is limited to a specific matter, the relationship terminates when the matter has been resolved. If an attorney has served a client over a substantial period in a variety of matters, the client sometimes may assume that the lawyer will serve on a continuing basis."

Ga. R. Prof. Cond. 1.3 Although there is little Georgia authority applying these principles, cases from other jurisdictions (applying ethics rules analogous to the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct) offer some relevant guidance.

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Next



Subscribe to Daily Report

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Professional Conduct
  • Qwest Communications International, Inc.

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Client Wins, Then Sues First Firm
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  2. Student Sues Over Facebook Photo Use
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  3. U.S. High Court Vacates 11th Cir. On Plea
    •      
  4. EBG Ditching Atlanta Office
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  5. 'Gideon's Army' Rallies Its Troops For Justice
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

SEC Issues Whistleblower Award; More on the Horizon

Fixing Outside Counsel Budget Forecasting With Data

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

iPad Competition Heats Up

Discovery on Discovery Demands Cost-Shifting

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of HUD Forms Draws Supreme Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

With Prison Looming, Marshall Mounts Bid for Reversal
  •      
    • Subscription Required

NYLJ 100

Pa. Justices Uphold Mandatory Judicial Retirement

Pa. Senate Mulling Bill Aimed at Redefining Child Abuse

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

DA Rosemary Lehmberg Faces Second Removal Suit
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Upholds Disqualification of Bickel & Brewer
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Gideon's Army' Rallies Its Troops For Justice

Kia Case To Put New Open Records Act To Test
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • Contact Daily Report   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media