Daily Report Online
  • News
  • Special Reports
  • Court Opinions
  • Court Calendars
  • Bench Guide
  • Public Notices
  • Contact
  • Books
  • Events
  • Classifieds

Home > Where are the attorney-client limits?

Font Size: increase font decrease font

IN PRACTICE

Where are the attorney-client limits?

Avoid disqualification by managing client relationships, knowing the ethics rules

By Simon R. Malko All Articles 

Daily Report

February 19, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 
Photo of Simon Malko

Simon R. Malko

Many attorneys incorrectly assume that an attorney-client relationship automatically ends when the work for the client is complete. That is not always the case.

Some courts have held that the attorney-client relationship continues, even after the billable work is complete, if the client has a reasonable belief that the engagement is open-ended. This issue often arises when an attorney tries to take on a new engagement adverse to a client for whom the attorney previously performed some work.

The ethics rules impose tight restrictions on when an attorney can be adverse to an existing client but provide much more liberal standards for engagements adverse to a former client. Thus, if an attorney does not confirm that an engagement has concluded, the attorney may be disqualified from taking on a future engagement adverse to a client.

Conflicts rules

Georgia Rule of Professional Conduct 1.7 generally prohibits an attorney from being adverse to an existing client unless certain conditions are met and the client consents. Moreover, with limited exceptions, it is not ethically permissible for an attorney to be adverse to an existing client in litigation, even if the litigation is wholly unrelated to the attorney's engagement for that client. 1

By contrast, Rule 1.9 requires only consent from the former client if the attorney intends to be adverse to a former client "in the same or a substantially related matter" to the lawyer's prior engagement.

No client consent is necessary if the attorney's new engagement adverse to a former client is unrelated to the prior work. Furthermore, there is no general prohibition against suing a former client.

Thus, whether it is ethically permissible for an attorney to accept a new engagement adverse to a client will often turn on the determination of whether that client is a former client or current client.2

When does a client

become a "former client"?

The comments to Georgia Rule of Professional Conduct 1.3 provide, in relevant part, the following general guidance regarding the termination of an attorney-client relationship:

"If an attorney's employment is limited to a specific matter, the relationship terminates when the matter has been resolved. If an attorney has served a client over a substantial period in a variety of matters, the client sometimes may assume that the lawyer will serve on a continuing basis."

Ga. R. Prof. Cond. 1.3 Although there is little Georgia authority applying these principles, cases from other jurisdictions (applying ethics rules analogous to the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct) offer some relevant guidance.

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Next



Subscribe to Daily Report

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Professional Conduct
  • Qwest Communications International, Inc.

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Real Estate Lawyers Target Closing Vendors
    •      
  2. Wage-and-Hour Suits Up For Fifth Straight Year
    •      
  3. Lawyer and Client to Pay Attorney Fees of Waffle House CEO
    •      
  4. How Law School Grads Can Improve Hiring Chances
    •      
  5. Too Much Paper, Lawyers Say
    •         
      • Subscription Required
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

3-D Printing: The Next Big Thing in IP Law?

Best Legal Departments 2013

News Corp. Hires Ex-Skadden Communications Chief Bush

Law Firm Leaders' Confidence Slipping, Says Survey

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

CEIC: the Destination for Digital Investigation

Using Computer Forensics to Investigate IP Theft

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Bar Candidate Quits N.Y. Job To Satisfy N.J. Practice Bylaw

Pro Bono Work Proposed as Condition for Bar Admission
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Judge in Stop-and-Frisk Case Relishes Her Independence

Ground Is Shifting in 14-Year Litigation

Third Circuit Rejects NLRB Recess Appointment

Judges Weigh Delaware Court of Chancery's Arbitration Program
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Litigator of the Week: Who Needs a Jury Consultant?
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses

Jury Finds For Attorney In Legal-Mal Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media