Daily Report Online
  • News
  • Special Reports
  • Court Opinions
  • Court Calendars
  • Bench Guide
  • Public Notices
  • Contact
  • Books
  • Events
  • Classifieds

Home > A new conversation on marriage

Font Size: increase font decrease font

At Issue

A new conversation on marriage

For the good of all families, the troubled institution needs to be strengthened

By Leah Ward Sears All Articles 

Daily Report

February 5, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •       Comments (1)
 
Photo of Leah Ward Sears

Leah Ward Sears is a partner in Schiff Hardin's Atlanta office, where she is the leader of the firm's national appellate client service team. She is the former chief justice of the Supreme Court of Georgia.

I serve on the board of directors of The Institute for American Values, a private, nonpartisan organization devoted to research, publication and public education on issues of family well-being and civil society. The Institute—whose president is David Blankenhorn, a key witness against gay marriage in the Proposition 8 trial in California in 2010—announced last week that it would no longer participate in the debate about same-sex marriage.

The Institute's message was declared in a letter titled, "A Call for a New Conversation on Marriage," which I signed along with more than 70 other signatories, including scholars, theologians, journalists and public intellectuals. In the letter, the Institute renounced the culture war that some—but not all—of its members were a part of, in favor of the pro-marriage/healthy family agenda that was the original purpose of the Institute.

Stated another way, the Institute, which has long had members from both sides of the gay marriage debate, is determined to shift its energies to saving the institution of marriage, regardless of whom one chooses as a mate. Whether a person is straight or gay, bisexual or transgender, we are saying, the challenge is to figure out how to strengthen marriage and our families for the broader benefit to society.

I'm pleased with the direction the Institute is taking. Unlike David, I was never against same-sex marriage. But much like David, I've witnessed the fallout from broken families in the past several decades, during which divorce and out-of-wedlock births have skyrocketed, and unstable, serial cohabiting relationships have become the norm for raising children.

I've also long been concerned, particularly from my vantage point when I was a judge, that marriage in America today is fracturing along class lines, contributing to growing inequality and a more insecure middle class—a problem that has nothing to do with sexual orientation.

I joined the board of directors of the Institute because I believe that this trend, like any trend, is not preordained, nor is it immune from human decision-making. This is the United States of America, after all. We are naturally leaders, innovators and problem solvers. We can confront this challenge and make healthy marriage achievable for all who seek it.

Our group will continue to focus on the disintegration of marriage, particularly in the middle and lower classes, which, research shows, is creating a new underclass of inequality.

As it happens, more well-educated people tend to stay married, while the less educated and poor are becoming a subculture of economically depressed, single-parent families. Children from such homes have a harder shot at happiness and well-being and are at a higher risk for a variety of negative outcomes such as behavioral problems, incarceration, teen pregnancy and substance abuse, to name just a few. That is unacceptable, and should be bothersome to us all.

My good friend and social critic, Barbara Dafoe Whitehead, author of the influential 1993 Atlantic Monthly magazine cover story, "Dan Quayle Was Right," says that "America can't be a united society if it splits into separate and unequal classes of marriage haves and have-nots—and that's what's rapidly happening."

In an op-ed published in The New York Times last summer, David Blankenhorn wrote: "Once we accept gay marriage, might we also agree that marrying before having children is a vital cultural value that all of us should do more to embrace? ... Can we agree that, for all lovers who want their love to last, marriage is preferable to cohabitation?"

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2

Next



Subscribe to Daily Report

You must be signed in to comment on an article

 

Reader Comments

  • David S. DeLugas

    February 05, 2013 09:15 AM

    I agree. While addressing marriage, as a society, we must also put energies and NEW ideas into how our divorce and custody laws contribute to the incidence of divorce and the conditions under which children of divorce are treated, contributing to the very woes Justice Sears identifies.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Post a Comment »
Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • 1993 Atlantic Monthly magazine
  • Institute for American Values
  • New York Times Company

Key categories

    
  • Civil Rights and Constitutional Law

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Real Estate Lawyers Target Closing Vendors
    •      
  2. Wage-and-Hour Suits Up For Fifth Straight Year
    •      
  3. Lawyer and Client to Pay Attorney Fees of Waffle House CEO
    •      
  4. How Law School Grads Can Improve Hiring Chances
    •      
  5. Too Much Paper, Lawyers Say
    •         
      • Subscription Required
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

3-D Printing: The Next Big Thing in IP Law?

Best Legal Departments 2013

News Corp. Hires Ex-Skadden Communications Chief Bush

Law Firm Leaders' Confidence Slipping, Says Survey

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

CEIC: the Destination for Digital Investigation

Using Computer Forensics to Investigate IP Theft

Gibson Dunn Turns Heads as It Climbs Am Law 100 List
  •      
    • Subscription Required

In Executive's Trade Secret Prosecution, a Company's Outsized Role

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Bar Candidate Quits N.Y. Job To Satisfy N.J. Practice Bylaw

Pro Bono Work Proposed as Condition for Bar Admission
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Judge in Stop-and-Frisk Case Relishes Her Independence

Ground Is Shifting in 14-Year Litigation

Third Circuit Rejects NLRB Recess Appointment

Judges Weigh Delaware Court of Chancery's Arbitration Program
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Litigator of the Week: Who Needs a Jury Consultant?
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses

Jury Finds For Attorney In Legal-Mal Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media