Daily Report Online
  • News
  • Special Reports
  • Court Opinions
  • Court Calendars
  • Bench Guide
  • Public Notices
  • Contact
  • Books
  • Events
  • Classifieds

Home > Seventh Circuit stays contraception insurance mandate

Font Size: increase font decrease font

News

Seventh Circuit stays contraception insurance mandate

By Sheri Qualters Contact All Articles 

The National Law Journal

February 4, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

A federal appeals court has issued a second ruling staying the health care reform law's requirement that health insurance plans cover contraception and related services.

The contraception mandate has been a particularly controversial part of President Barack Obama's Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. On Friday, the Obama administration proposed a new compromise in an effort to address the concerns of religious nonprofit organizations to the law, which requires employers to provide health insurance that includes artificial contraception, including sterilization, as a free preventive service.

The compromise is a work-around for religious nonprofits and would provide their employees with contraceptive services outside of the employers' health insurance plan.

Early reports on the compromise plan did not appear to affect the rules for employers who are not part of religious organizations but object to providing contraception on the basis of personal religious beliefs of company owners. Recent U.S. Court of Appeals cases have involved several such companies.

In the latest ruling, on Jan. 30, a split U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit panel in Grote v. Sebelius granted the plaintiffs' injunction motion while their appeal is pending. The injunction bars U.S. government agencies from enforcing the law's contraception mandate against the Grote family and its company, Grote Industries. The Grote family is Catholic and claims those regulations violate its religious freedoms.

Judges Joel Flaum and Diane Sykes joined the order. Judge Ilana Diamond Rovner filed a dissent.

On Dec. 28, 2012, the same panel issued a similar order with the same split in Korte v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. That ruling barred the government from enforcing the disputed mandate against the Korte family and its construction company, Korte & Luitjohan Contractors Inc.

In addition, in a one-sentence split order on Nov. 28, 2012, the Eighth Circuit granted a similar preliminary injunction motion in O'Brien v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

The cases are among several challenges to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act at the district and appellate courts.

The contraception mandate applies during the first health plan year after Aug. 1, 2012.

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Next



Subscribe to The National Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Treasury Departments
  • Seventh Circuit
  • United States Department of Health and Human Services
  • Grote Industries
  • Labor Department
  • Eighth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals
  • Justice Department

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Lawyers Sanctioned Over Porn Lawsuits File Appeal
    •      
  2. DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses
    •      
  3. Lawyer Discipline: Cases Include Suspension, License Surrender
    •      
  4. Lenders Win On Foreclosures
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  5. Brooks Looks To Political Ally For Criminal Defense
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Summer Interns? Make Sure You Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Cisco E-Book Delivers Ethics on the Go

Collaboration Is Key to Defending Cyberattacks

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Loaner Judges Helping Essex Cope With Persistent Vacancies
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Surrogate Faces Suspension for Political Activity, Drunken Driving
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Circuit Reinstates Lawsuit by Inmate Over Cell Conditions
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Custody Ruling in Bitter Fight May Turn on 11-Year-Old's Wish
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Filing Blunder To Cost $142,600
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court: Injured College Student Can't Sue State
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • Contact Daily Report   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media