Daily Report Online
  • News
  • Special Reports
  • Court Opinions
  • Court Calendars
  • Bench Guide
  • Public Notices
  • Contact
  • Books
  • Events
  • Classifieds

Home > Lawyers struggle to fight gun seizures in Connecticut

Font Size: increase font decrease font

News

Previous

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Next

Lawyers struggle to fight gun seizures in Connecticut

January 29, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

The troopers complete a report which is presented at a subsequent court hearing, at which a judge decides how long the guns should be held—up to a year.

Most of the calls come from spouses, he said, usually wives. The most common type of behavior in the complaint is that the person is suicidal.

State troopers aren't the only ones permitted to seize weapons. The law allows any two police officers, or a prosecutor, to get warrants and seize guns from anyone who poses a risk of injuring himself, someone else, or an animal.

The warrant can be sought only after the officers conduct an investigation to establish that probable cause of a risk exists, or after they rule out a reasonable alternative. An alternative, police say, would be if the person voluntarily agrees to surrender the weapon.

Before issuing a warrant, a judge determines whether violent acts were committed, whether a gun was displayed and whether a person has a history of unstable behavior.

In one notable case, a man was reported by his landlord to Berlin, Conn., police in 2004 for allegedly stating, "I am going to kill myself and take a few people with me." Police obtained a warrant and seized 18 guns from the man.

Four years later, a man called police in New Milford, Conn., "to report strange sightings, including trucks coming out of the ground and shape-changing trailers on his property." He threatened to shoot people in the trailers. Four guns were seized.

In the decade-long period tracked by the Office of Legislative Research, judges refused to grant the warrants only twice, a statistic that troubles advocates for gun owners.

Attorneys who have represented people trying to get their firearms back agree it can be difficult to fight a seizure warrant in court. Though the initial confiscation can be appealed, judges are reluctant to return weapons before the one-year maximum confiscation period has passed.

According to the state Office of Legislative Research, only in 22 instances between 1999 and 2009 were weapons returned more quickly than that. After a year, authorities either return the firearms to the former owner or—after a hearing—destroy them, if there's evidence that the former owner is still unstable.

Continue reading

Previous

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Next



Subscribe to The Connecticut Law Tribune

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Newtown
  • Office of Legislative Research
  • Judicial Branch
  • Sandy Hook Elementary School
  • Connecticut State Lottery
  • Office of Policy and Management
  • Connecticut State Police

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Lawyer Vanishes Leaving N.J. Firm With A Broken Settlement
    •      
  2. Student Sues Over Facebook Photo Use
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  3. U.S. High Court Vacates 11th Cir. On Plea
    •      
  4. EBG Ditching Atlanta Office
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  5. 'Gideon's Army' Rallies Its Troops For Justice
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

In-House Counsel Go to Privacy Boot Camp

In-House Changes at News Corp Ahead of Corporate Split

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

Nine Tips to Avoid Starring in a Spreadsheet Horror Story

Snapshot: Tom Gelbmann

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of HUD Forms Draws Supreme Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Restaurant in Union Square Park Ruled Permissible
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Magistrate Judge Finds Few Benefits to Class in Settlement
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Third Circuit Could See Rise in Pay-for-Delay Litigation

Cozen Debt Forgiveness Is Campaign Contribution, Court Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Interim Dean Named at Texas Wesleyan University School of Law
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Water Works: H2O Kept Lawyer-Lobbyists Busy
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fighting Over The Fifth
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Atlanta School Defendants Rely On New Jersey Officers' Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment

  • Contact Daily Report   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media