Daily Report Online
  • News
  • Special Reports
  • Court Opinions
  • Court Calendars
  • Bench Guide
  • Public Notices
  • Contact
  • Books
  • Events
  • Classifieds

Home > Banks believe they can live with new mortgage-underwriting rule

Font Size: increase font decrease font

News

Banks believe they can live with new mortgage-underwriting rule

By Todd Ruger Contact All Articles 

The National Law Journal

January 14, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's new "ability-to-repay" regulations contain a key legal protection for mortgage lenders, leaving their attorneys cautiously optimistic that the process will work.

The bureau released the broad outlines of its new rule on Jan. 10. Attorneys said they need to dig through the full text and supporting documents that will shape how the mortgage industry does business.

"The basic features are there, but this is one of the rules where the devil is really going to be in the details," said Donald Lampe, leader of Dykema Gossett's financial services regulatory and compliance team. "The implementation challenges are by no means going to be simple, and the larger institutions will start working on it right now."

The idea is to ensure that lenders offer mortgages that consumers can actually afford to pay back. The bureau lays much of the blame for the financial crisis on recklessness by lenders that led to dramatically increased mortgage delinquencies and rates of foreclosures.

Banks now will have to verify that borrowers can afford their mortgages, and payments can amount to no more than 43 percent of their income. On the other hand, the rule will create a legal safe harbor for lenders who issue these qualified mortgages.

"The odds of facing any protracted litigation are more limited," said Rich Andreano, Jr., leader of the mortgage-banking practice at Ballard Spahr.

Additionally, he said, the rule appears to clearly define which loans will earn lenders that protection—an important point for making lenders more comfortable about giving out money. "A safe harbor is only good when you know you're in the harbor," Andreano said.

Americans for Financial Reform and other consumer advocate groups had argued that homeowners should be able to seek redress if their loans were demonstrably unaffordable when issued. That standard, a rebuttable presumption, will apply to loans that fall outside the qualified-mortgage category.

The rule, at the very least, will generate legal work as lenders come into compliance, Lampe said. The rule amounts to a compromise, he said, and with compromise comes complexity.

The bureau was charged with implementing the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which imposed ability-to-repay standards. The repay rule will go into effect in 2014; in the meantime, attorneys will look for provisions that may need clarification or that the industry might want to petition Congress or the agency to change, Andreano said.

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2

Next



Subscribe to The National Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Ballard Spahr
  • Dykema Gossett
  • Hunton & Williams

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Financial Reform
  • Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Client Wins, Then Sues First Firm
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  2. Student Sues Over Facebook Photo Use
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  3. U.S. High Court Vacates 11th Cir. On Plea
    •      
  4. EBG Ditching Atlanta Office
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  5. 'Gideon's Army' Rallies Its Troops For Justice
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

SEC Issues Whistleblower Award; More on the Horizon

Fixing Outside Counsel Budget Forecasting With Data

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

iPad Competition Heats Up

Discovery on Discovery Demands Cost-Shifting

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of HUD Forms Draws Supreme Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

With Prison Looming, Marshall Mounts Bid for Reversal
  •      
    • Subscription Required

NYLJ 100

Pa. Justices Uphold Mandatory Judicial Retirement

Pa. Senate Mulling Bill Aimed at Redefining Child Abuse

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

DA Rosemary Lehmberg Faces Second Removal Suit
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Upholds Disqualification of Bickel & Brewer
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fighting Over The Fifth
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Atlanta School Defendants Rely On New Jersey Officers' Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • Contact Daily Report   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media