Daily Report Online
  • News
  • Special Reports
  • Court Opinions
  • Court Calendars
  • Bench Guide
  • Public Notices
  • Contact
  • Books
  • Events
  • Classifieds

Home > SC voter ID lawsuit cost state more than $3.5M

Font Size: increase font decrease font

News

SC voter ID lawsuit cost state more than $3.5M

By Meg Kinnard All Articles 

The Associated Press

January 10, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) - The federal government will have to pay a small part of South Carolina's $3.5 million price tag for a lawsuit over the state's tough new voter ID law, a judicial panel has ruled.

Last week, the three judges who presided over the state's lawsuit said because South Carolina won, it's up to the federal government to pick up some of the tab.

"South Carolina is accordingly entitled to costs from both defendants and defendant-intervenors," the judges wrote in an order filed Friday in U.S. District Court in Washington.

South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson initially asked the federal government to pay $90,000 in legal costs, but the judges did not set a specific amount for the federal government to pay.

Wilson sued last year after the U.S. Department of Justice rejected the state's law requiring voters to show specific photo identification at the polls. In its rejection, the Justice Department decided the law violated part of the federal Voting Rights Act, which protects minority voters.

South Carolina's voter photo ID law was subject to approval from the Justice Department because of its history of racial discrimination. South Carolina's law was the first voting law to be refused federal clearance in nearly 20 years.

The case was sent to federal district court in Washington, where three judges heard arguments last year. In October, the panel unanimously upheld the law, ruling that it would not diminish African-Americans' voting rights because people who face a "reasonable impediment" to getting an acceptable photo ID can still vote if they sign an affidavit. But the judges delayed its enforcement until this year, finding that the law was not discriminatory because of its safeguards but also noting it would require more time to put those protections against discrimination in place.

Wilson originally said that he thought the suit would cost around $1 million, but spokesman Mark Powell said the tab ballooned as the case dragged on through the court system. On Friday, a legislative panel approved Wilson's request for an additional $2 million to cover the costs and sent its recommendation for the funds to the Office of State Budget, which has the final say.

The tough new law got its first test on Tuesday, as voters in Orangeburg County's Branchville selected a new town council representative. The Justice Department has said it will be monitoring the contest.

Last year, Wilson asked the federal government to pay South Carolina more than $90,000. In their order, the judges set out specific expenses that South Carolina may recoup from the federal government, like the costs to transcribe audio recordings of legislative debate over the law, but set no dollar amount.

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2

Next

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • State Budget
  • US District Court
  • Justice Department
  • United States Department of Justice

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Student Sues Over Facebook Photo Use
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  2. U.S. High Court Vacates 11th Cir. On Plea
    •      
  3. Lawyer Vanishes Leaving N.J. Firm With A Broken Settlement
    •      
  4. EBG Ditching Atlanta Office
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  5. 'Gideon's Army' Rallies Its Troops For Justice
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

In-House Counsel Go to Privacy Boot Camp

In-House Changes at News Corp Ahead of Corporate Split

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

Nine Tips to Avoid Starring in a Spreadsheet Horror Story

Snapshot: Tom Gelbmann

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of HUD Forms Draws Supreme Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Restaurant in Union Square Park Ruled Permissible
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Magistrate Judge Finds Few Benefits to Class in Settlement
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Third Circuit Could See Rise in Pay-for-Delay Litigation

Cozen Debt Forgiveness Is Campaign Contribution, Court Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Interim Dean Named at Texas Wesleyan University School of Law
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Water Works: H2O Kept Lawyer-Lobbyists Busy
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fighting Over The Fifth
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Atlanta School Defendants Rely On New Jersey Officers' Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment

  • Contact Daily Report   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media