Daily Report Online
  • News
  • Special Reports
  • Court Opinions
  • Court Calendars
  • Bench Guide
  • Public Notices
  • Contact
  • Books
  • Events
  • Classifieds

Home > High court weighs Georgia hospital merger

Font Size: increase font decrease font

News

High court weighs Georgia hospital merger

The Associated Press

November 26, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday questioned a monopoly on hospital services in southwestern Georgia.

The justices heard arguments in the federal government's claim that two private corporations used a public hospital authority to complete a deal that left one company as the owner of the only two hospitals in Albany, Ga. The Federal Trade Commission says the deal violates federal antitrust law.

The question at the high court is whether an exception in antitrust law for actions taken by a state or its agencies — in this case, the hospital authority — shields the transaction from federal concerns.

Lower federal courts allowed Albany's Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital to buy Palmyra Medical Center from Hospital Corporation of America for $195 million over the FTC's objection.

Both hospitals now are nominally owned by the Hospital Authority of Albany-Dougherty County, but run by the Phoebe Putney Health System under long-term leases. The money for the Palmyra purchase came from the health system, not the authority.

The court has long accepted that the some business deals that lead to monopolies that otherwise would raise antitrust concerns are allowable if they are done by states. But in such cases, the states have to explain clearly why competition is not in the public interest and they have to ensure a level of control and oversight of the monopolies.

Justice Elena Kagan was among several members of the court who pressed Seth Waxman, the Washington lawyer representing the Georgia hospitals, about whether Georgia clearly endorsed deals that leave one company in control of all the hospital beds in a city or county.

Waxman said the hospital authority, with a duty under state law to serve the poor, had only two ways to find additional needed bed space.

"It could have tried to convince the state to spend three times as much money to get half the number of beds," by building a new facility, Waxman said. Or, "it could buy the other hospital."

A decision is expected by June.

The case is Federal Trade Commission v. Phoebe Putney Health System, 11-1160.

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Phoebe Putney Health System
  • Palmyra Medical Center
  • Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • HCA Inc.
  • Supreme Court

Key categories

    
  • Antitrust and Trade Regulation

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Student Sues Over Facebook Photo Use
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  2. U.S. High Court Vacates 11th Cir. On Plea
    •      
  3. Lawyer Vanishes Leaving N.J. Firm With A Broken Settlement
    •      
  4. EBG Ditching Atlanta Office
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  5. 'Gideon's Army' Rallies Its Troops For Justice
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

In-House Counsel Go to Privacy Boot Camp

In-House Changes at News Corp Ahead of Corporate Split

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

iPad Competition Heats Up

Discovery on Discovery Demands Cost-Shifting

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of HUD Forms Draws Supreme Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Restaurant in Union Square Park Ruled Permissible
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Magistrate Judge Finds Few Benefits to Class in Settlement
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Third Circuit Could See Rise in Pay-for-Delay Litigation

Cozen Debt Forgiveness Is Campaign Contribution, Court Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Interim Dean Named at Texas Wesleyan University School of Law
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Water Works: H2O Kept Lawyer-Lobbyists Busy
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fighting Over The Fifth
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Atlanta School Defendants Rely On New Jersey Officers' Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • Contact Daily Report   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media