Daily Report Online
  • News
  • Special Reports
  • Court Opinions
  • Court Calendars
  • Bench Guide
  • Public Notices
  • Contact
  • Books
  • Events
  • Classifieds

Home > Tenn. to appeal voter ID ruling over library card

Font Size: increase font decrease font

News

Tenn. to appeal voter ID ruling over library card

By Adrain Sainz and Lucas Johnson II All Articles 

The Associated Press

October 26, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

MEMPHIS, Tenn. (AP) - After winning a ruling that upheld Tennessee's new law requiring voters to show photo identification at the polls, election officials said they will ask the state Supreme Court to step in because the decision also ordered them to accept an ID issued by the Memphis public library.

The Court of Appeals ruled Thursday that the law was constitutional but it also said the library card qualified as a government-issued photo ID. The court issued a separate order requiring election officials to immediately accept the Memphis library cards.

Secretary of State Tre Hargett praised much of the ruling even as he announced the decision to file an appeal on Friday.

"They've called it a burden on voting and once again the judiciary has said not it's not," Hargett said.

The city of Memphis and two voters who lacked photo ID and cast provisional ballots during the August primary sued in both federal and state court to stop the law that took effect this year.

The state's decision to seek an appeal underscores how voter ID has been a top priority among the Republicans who control state government because a new filing could open the way for the Tennessee Supreme Court to strike down the entire law.

Attorney Douglas Johnston said he is consulting with his client, the City of Memphis, about whether to also appeal the parts of the ruling that upheld the voter ID law.

"More than likely they're going to want to appeal it themselves," he said. "I'm just not sure the Supreme Court can get it done in the short amount of time before the election."

The appeals court opinion acknowledged the fierce fight over the law.

"We note that the Voter Photo ID Act has created much controversy and aroused intense feelings among both its supporters and its detractors. The courts do not question the General Assembly's motives or concern themselves with the General Assembly's policy judgments," the opinion said.

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Next

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Republicans
  • City of Memphis
  • General Assembly
  • Supreme Court
  • Court of Appeals

Key categories

    
  • Immigration Law

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Lawyer Vanishes Leaving N.J. Firm With A Broken Settlement
    •      
  2. Student Sues Over Facebook Photo Use
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  3. U.S. High Court Vacates 11th Cir. On Plea
    •      
  4. EBG Ditching Atlanta Office
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  5. 'Gideon's Army' Rallies Its Troops For Justice
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

In-House Counsel Go to Privacy Boot Camp

In-House Changes at News Corp Ahead of Corporate Split

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

Nine Tips to Avoid Starring in a Spreadsheet Horror Story

Snapshot: Tom Gelbmann

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of HUD Forms Draws Supreme Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Restaurant in Union Square Park Ruled Permissible
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Magistrate Judge Finds Few Benefits to Class in Settlement
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Third Circuit Could See Rise in Pay-for-Delay Litigation

Cozen Debt Forgiveness Is Campaign Contribution, Court Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Interim Dean Named at Texas Wesleyan University School of Law
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Water Works: H2O Kept Lawyer-Lobbyists Busy
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fighting Over The Fifth
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Atlanta School Defendants Rely On New Jersey Officers' Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment

  • Contact Daily Report   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media