Daily Report Online
  • News
  • Special Reports
  • Court Opinions
  • Court Calendars
  • Bench Guide
  • Public Notices
  • Contact
  • Books
  • Events
  • Classifieds

Home > Ohio to appeal to Supreme Court on early voting

Font Size: increase font decrease font

NEWS

Ohio to appeal to Supreme Court on early voting

By Ann Sanner and Julie Carr Smyth All Articles 

The Associated Press

October 9, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

COLUMBUS, Ohio -- Ohio's election chief said Tuesday he will appeal a ruling that reinstates the final three early voting days in the battleground state, calling a decision last week by a federal appeals court "an unprecedented intrusion" into how states run elections.

Secretary of State Jon Husted said he will ask the U.S. Supreme Court to decide whether the state Legislature or federal courts should set Ohio election laws.

Husted said Friday's decision by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals would impact how elections are run in all 50 states. The appeals court in Cincinnati affirmed a lower court ruling and returned discretion to set hours on the final three days to local boards of elections.

"This ruling not only doesn't make legal sense, it doesn't make practical sense," Husted, a Republican, said in a statement.

He said it opened up the chance for Ohio's 88 county boards of elections to set different rules, while at the same time ordering that all voters be treated the same. Husted said he will be consulting with those boards to craft a directive that sets uniform hours on the three disputed days in the event his appeal isn't successful.

President Barack Obama's campaign and Democrats had sued Husted and Ohio's attorney general for cutting off early voting for most residents on the Friday evening before a Tuesday election. The law makes an exception for military personnel and Ohio voters living overseas.

Democrats had argued everyone should have the chance to vote on those three days. They said eliminating the opportunity for most Ohio residents to vote in person on those days, while giving military or overseas voters the chance to do so, led to unequal treatment.

The decision the 6th Circuit affirmed Friday came from U.S. District Judge Peter Economus in August. He said he expected Husted to direct all county elections boards to maintain a specific, consistent schedule on the three final days before Election Day.

Attorneys for the state said many laws already grant military personnel special voting accommodations, such as requirements for states to send absentee ballots to them 45 days before the election. And they contend local boards also need those three days to prepare for the election.

But Economus said the voters' right to cast ballots in person on those days outweighs the state's reasons for limiting that opportunity.

The judge issued a preliminary injunction on Aug. 31, concluding that the state's law was unconstitutional in changing the in-person early voting deadline and that the state was wrongly valuing certain votes above others.

Husted's announcement that he would go to the U.S. Supreme Court came on a day when Obama was campaigning in the state, timing a rally at the Ohio State University campus to the final day of voter registration.

Obama's fellow Democrats criticized Husted for fostering voter confusion. State Sen. Nina Turner, of Cleveland, said Husted could set uniform statewide hours on the final three days before the election if that is his goal.

Senate Democratic Leader Eric Kearney accused Husted of using delay tactics to impede voters' rights. "It is now clear that Secretary of State Jon Husted will stop at nothing to deny Ohioans full and equal access to the polls," he said.

Before the changes to the law, local boards of elections previously set early voting hours on the three final days. And weekday hours and weekend voting varied among the state's counties.

Democrats estimated in their lawsuit that 93,000 people voted during the final three-day window before the 2008 election.

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Democrats
  • 6th Circuit
  • U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
  • The Ohio State University
  • Supreme Court of the United States

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Real Estate Lawyers Target Closing Vendors
    •      
  2. Wage-and-Hour Suits Up For Fifth Straight Year
    •      
  3. Lawyer and Client to Pay Attorney Fees of Waffle House CEO
    •      
  4. How Law School Grads Can Improve Hiring Chances
    •      
  5. Too Much Paper, Lawyers Say
    •         
      • Subscription Required
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

3-D Printing: The Next Big Thing in IP Law?

Best Legal Departments 2013

News Corp. Hires Ex-Skadden Communications Chief Bush

Law Firm Leaders' Confidence Slipping, Says Survey

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

CEIC: the Destination for Digital Investigation

Using Computer Forensics to Investigate IP Theft

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Bar Candidate Quits N.Y. Job To Satisfy N.J. Practice Bylaw

Pro Bono Work Proposed as Condition for Bar Admission
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Judge in Stop-and-Frisk Case Relishes Her Independence

Ground Is Shifting in 14-Year Litigation

High Court Names Evers as the FJD's Court Administrator
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Third Circuit Rules Against Citgo in Case Over Oil Spill

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Litigator of the Week: Who Needs a Jury Consultant?
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses

Jury Finds For Attorney In Legal-Mal Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media