Daily Report Online
  • News
  • Special Reports
  • Court Opinions
  • Court Calendars
  • Bench Guide
  • Public Notices
  • Contact
  • Books
  • Events
  • Classifieds

Home > Judge rejects suit challenging Va lethal injection

Font Size: increase font decrease font

News

Judge rejects suit challenging Va lethal injection

By Larry O'Dell All Articles 

The Associated Press

September 19, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

RICHMOND, Va. (AP) - A judge said Wednesday that he did not to hear any evidence before concluding that lethal injection in Virginia does not amount to practicing medicine without a license.

Richmond Circuit Judge Gregory Rupe commended two Alexandria attorneys for an "imaginative" challenge, but he refused to let their lawsuit go to trial.

Rupe said he could require Department of Corrections officials to appear in court to defend the way they carry out death sentences, but the question would ultimately come down to whether he believes lethal injection is the practice of medicine.

"It is not," the judge said in dismissing the lawsuit filed by attorneys Meghan Shapiro and Christopher Leibig.

Shapiro said after the half-hour hearing that she and Leibig "respectfully disagree" with Rupe's conclusion and are considering an appeal.

"General anesthesia is medicine and only medical professionals can legally do it," Shapiro said.

The lawsuit, filed in April, claimed that the methods used by Virginia to execute condemned inmates amount to the unauthorized practice of medicine, pharmacy and anesthesiology. The plaintiffs and Richard Dieter, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center, said they are aware of no other challenge that has claimed executioners are violating medical licensing laws and regulations.

Richard Vorhis of the attorney general's office argued during the hearing that state law defines medical practice as the diagnosis, treatment or prevention of disease — precisely the opposite of an execution, which is the court-ordered taking of a life. He also said state law requires the Department of Corrections to carry out executions.

Shapiro said the law directs the department to "cause" death sentences to be carried out, suggesting that licensed medical professionals could be used. Vorhis said doctors likely would refuse to participate because of their Hippocratic oath, but Shapiro said other licensed medical professionals could be employed.

"It is quite feasible to conduct executions in a way that doesn't violate laws of the commonwealth," she said.

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2

Next

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Follow Larry O'Dell on Twitter
  • Death Penalty Information Center
  • plaintiffs and Richard Dieter
  • Department of Corrections

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Lawyers Sanctioned Over Porn Lawsuits File Appeal
    •      
  2. Court: Injured College Student Can't Sue State
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  3. DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses
    •      
  4. Lawyer Discipline: Cases Include Suspension, License Surrender
    •      
  5. Lenders Win On Foreclosures
    •         
      • Subscription Required
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

In Tricky Prosecutions, Judges Play Peacemakers

Ropers Majeski Tries to Re-Invent Itself
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Not Covered for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Firm Takes Another Hit in Bid for 'Unconscionable' Fees

New York's Martin Act Faces Test in Challenge to 2005 Case

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Follow That Escapee!'

Judge Who Tossed Defense Counsel Accused of 'Partiality'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • Contact Daily Report   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media