Daily Report Online
  • News
  • Special Reports
  • Court Opinions
  • Court Calendars
  • Bench Guide
  • Public Notices
  • Contact
  • Books
  • Events
  • Classifieds

Home > New case at high court aims to blunt class actions

Font Size: increase font decrease font

News

New case at high court aims to blunt class actions

The Associated Press

August 31, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

WASHINGTON (AP)  The Supreme Court will consider an insurance company's plea to move a class-action lawsuit from state court to a more business-friendly federal court.

The justices on Friday agreed to hear an appeal from The Standard Fire Insurance Co. of Hartford, Conn. The case involves the reach of a 2005 federal law that allows defendants in class-action lawsuits to transfer disputes involving more than $5 million to a federal court from state courts that often favor plaintiffs.

Standard Fire is being sued in Arkansas by a homeowner who complained the company did not pay enough to repair hail damage.

A federal appeals court ruled that the suit could remain in state court because the homeowner has promised in writing to seek less than $5 million for himself and other Arkansas homeowners insured by Standard Fire.

The issue for the justices if whether the promise made by homeowner Greg Knowles, who lives in Miller County in southwestern Arkansas, is binding on others who may eventually be part of the lawsuit.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the nation's largest business group, sided with the insurance company in urging the court to take the case because it is "of exceptional importance" to the business community.

The chamber said plaintiffs and their lawyers easily could avoid federal courts and the greater protection they afford defendants in class-action lawsuits by promising to limit the amount of money at stake.

Knowles put forward several reasons for turning down the appeal, including that the state court has yet even to certify that Knowles can represent similarly situated Standard Fire policy holders.

The case probably will be argued after Thanksgiving.

The justices rarely decide in the middle of the summer to add new cases for the term that begins in October. But they were short of cases to fill their December argument calendar, and if they waited until their next scheduled conference in late September, there would not be enough time to file legal briefs before the early December argument dates.
 

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • The Standard Fire Insurance Co. of Hartford, Conn.
  • The Supreme Court
  • U.S. Chamber of Commerce

Key categories

    
  • State and Local Courts

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Lawyer Vanishes Leaving N.J. Firm With A Broken Settlement
    •      
  2. Student Sues Over Facebook Photo Use
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  3. U.S. High Court Vacates 11th Cir. On Plea
    •      
  4. 'Gideon's Army' Rallies Its Troops For Justice
    •      
  5. EBG Ditching Atlanta Office
    •         
      • Subscription Required
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

In-House Counsel Go to Privacy Boot Camp

In-House Changes at News Corp Ahead of Corporate Split

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

Nine Tips to Avoid Starring in a Spreadsheet Horror Story

Snapshot: Tom Gelbmann

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of Forms Draws N.J. High Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Ties to Senecas Cannot Shield Golf Course Developer, Panel Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Circuit Decision Costs Prevailing Attorneys $200,000 Fee Award
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corbett Signs Bill to Eliminate Traffic Court

Christian College Granted Injunction In Obamacare Suit
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Interim Dean Named at Texas Wesleyan University School of Law
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Water Works: H2O Kept Lawyer-Lobbyists Busy
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Boosting Lawyers And Saving Lives
  •      
    • Subscription Required

11th Circuit Conflicted On Juveniles Stance
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment

  • Contact Daily Report   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media